lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611194016.GA5213@Krystal>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:40:16 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: sequence lock in Linux

Hi Paul,

(CCing lkml)

Is it just me, or the following code:

static __always_inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
{
        unsigned ret;

repeat:
        ret = sl->sequence;
        smp_rmb();
        if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
                cpu_relax();
                goto repeat;
        }

        return ret;
}

could use a ACCESS_ONCE() around the sl->sequence read ? I'm concerned about the
compiler generating code that reads the sequence number chunkwise.

The same apply to all other reads of the sequence number in seqlock.h (including
the retry code).

Thoughts ?

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ