[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611194016.GA5213@Krystal>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:40:16 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: sequence lock in Linux
Hi Paul,
(CCing lkml)
Is it just me, or the following code:
static __always_inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
{
unsigned ret;
repeat:
ret = sl->sequence;
smp_rmb();
if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
cpu_relax();
goto repeat;
}
return ret;
}
could use a ACCESS_ONCE() around the sl->sequence read ? I'm concerned about the
compiler generating code that reads the sequence number chunkwise.
The same apply to all other reads of the sequence number in seqlock.h (including
the retry code).
Thoughts ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists