[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536217.22740.qm@web180312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Fix the outstanding issue with hangs on insert/removal of mmc cards
--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> After thinking a lot about how to fix properly the hangs
> caused by
> insert/removal of mmc card during suspend/resume, and default behavior
> of not trusting the card persistence over suspend,
Right; there are two types of driver: ones
that can correctly report whether the card
has been removed ... and ones that can't That
default behavior presumes the latter.
The MMC/SD framework doesn't know about these
two types
(For
reference: the easy way to do the former involves
setting up the GPIO used for card detect as a
(wakeup?) IRQ source.
> First of all there are 2 types of removal possible. First
> one happens
> when system detects that some device is gone. At that point
> there is
> really no point in syncing it.
One suggestion was syncing before suspend...
but that would require coordinating the
block layer and PM framework. That seems
like it'd be generally a wise thing to do;
no point in losing the write cache, ever.
> The other type of removal is controlled removal, usually on user request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists