linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl skip long lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:36:12 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@...qy.com>, apw@...onical.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl skip long lines

On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 03:04 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> 
> > since the number of long lines in the linux kernel is huge and since
> > Greg Kroah Hartman in his google tech talk about the kernel
> > (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2SED6sewRw) talked about probably
> > ignore that criteria in the future, I thought the checkpatch.pl script
> > should have an option to ignore checking for long lines.
> > 
> > This would help finding the real errors and warnings, because they don't
> > drown in line length warnings.
> 
> Instead of adding another command-line option, I'd suggest to just use CHK
> instead of WARN, so this check will be enabled with --strict. I wonder if there
> is already consensus on deprecating the 80-char-rule?

Nope.  There's a vocal contingent that doesn't like it though.
An earlier thread and suggested patch below.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/18/3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/