linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:54:08 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism

On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 18:25 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > NMI can be triggered even when IRQ is masked. So it is not safe for NMI 
> > handler to call some functions. One solution is to delay the call via self 
> > interrupt, so that the delayed call can be done once the interrupt is 
> > enabled again. This has been implemented in MCE and perf event. This patch 
> > provides a unified version and make it easier for other NMI semantic handler 
> > to take use of the delayed call.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/entry_arch.h  |    1 
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h      |    1 
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h |    5 +
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h         |    7 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S         |    3 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c          |    3 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c            |  104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
> 
> Instead of introducing this extra intermediate facility please use the same 
> approach the unified NMI watchdog is using (see latest -tip): a perf event 
> callback gives all the extra functionality needed.

Sorry, if my understanding is correct, the perf event overflow callback
should be run in NMI context instead of a delayed context (such as IRQ,
soft_irq, process context). That is, the backtrace of
watchdog_overflow_callback should be something as follow:

x86_pmu_handle_irq
  perf_event_overflow
    __perf_event_overflow
      watchdog_overflow_callback

I do not find the delayed mechanism here.

> The MCE code needs to be updated to use that - and then it will be integrated
> into the events framework.

MCE is NMI-like, and there are other NMI users too. I think some of them
will need some kind of delayed call mechanism. In fact, perf itself uses
self-made NMI delayed call mechanism too, I just want to generalize it
for other users too.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/