[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C160E0E.4010802@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:10:06 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: "jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] Add MMC erase and secure erase
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:01:34PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Add ability to do MMC erase and secure erase operations from userspace,
>> using the BLKDISCARD ioctl and a newly created BLKSECDISCARD ioctl.
>
> Have you done any measurement if the use of the block layer changes
> performance of the discard requests for you?
No. For my purposes there will be only 1 discard request for the entire
device which will take several minutes to process, so block layer
performance is not a factor.
> I'd really prefer to
> send down the secure erase that way, too. This could easily be done
> by having a DISCARD_SECURE rw flag, which just ORs another flag into
> the request type field.
Needs a bio flag, a request flag, setup the request flag based on the
bio flag, prevent merging secure and non-secure discards, prevent drivers
doing non-secure discards for secure discards.
Seems like a lot of little changes for something that no one wants.
Shouldn't it wait for someone to need it first?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists