| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <hv58sc$b1b$1@dough.gmane.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:55:39 -0700 From: walt <w41ter@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Noticeable slow-down in 2.6.35-rc3 On 06/13/2010 03:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Unfortunately, this patch will not apply to my src tree for 2.6.35-rc3, > even after I fixed the unwanted line wrap in the first active line. > > I get: > > [root@...ote linux-2.6.35-rc3]# patch -p1<../2.6.35-rc3-test.patch > patching file net/core/skbuff.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 532. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/core/skbuff.c.rej > > Did my grabbing it with swiftfox damage it even further? > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > index 9f07e74..bcf2fa3 100644 > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ static void __copy_skb_header(struct sk_buff *new, const struct sk_buff *old) > new->ip_summed = old->ip_summed; I don't know what caused the corruption, but it's a systematic error. Throughout the patch, the dereference symbol -> has been changed to -& so it's not surprising that the patch won't apply. I've never seen that particular problem before. I don't think the line numbers (e.g.532) are responsible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists