[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C169AA6.6030809@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:09:58 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, clemens@...isch.de,
debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8]reiserfs:stree.c Fix variable set but not used.
On 06/14/2010 01:48 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 13:26 Mon 14 Jun , Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> @@ -617,8 +616,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s
>>
>> pathrelse(search_path);
>>
>> - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0;
>> -
>> +
>
> This hunk introduces whitespace on the empty line, which is not cool.
I can resend!!(biggest problem is working
through these warnings)
>
>> /* With each iteration of this loop we search through the items in the
>> current node, and calculate the next current node(next path element)
>> for the next iteration of this loop.. */
>> @@ -695,8 +693,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s
>> starting from the root. */
>> block_number = SB_ROOT_BLOCK(sb);
>> expected_level = -1;
>> - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0;
>> -
>> +
>
> Here, too.
>
> Most of the patches in this series have similar issues.
>
main thing now(for me atleast)is,
is this actual dead code or what?
if not then something else needs to
be done, if yes then I guess I can
resend this, with out the whitespace
issue.
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists