[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C169ABC.1090406@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:10:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@...world.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>,
Joseph Chan <JosephChan@....com.tw>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, pci: Handle fallout pci devices with peer root
bus
On 06/14/2010 01:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> OK, but Graham's system doesn't have anything resembling a PCI-to-PCI
> bridge leading to bus 80. So while I agree that in an ideal world,
> HT/PCI host bridges might always look like PCI-to-PCI bridges, it
> seems this is not the case in practice.
>
Invisible PCI bridges have been known to occur in pure PCI space, too.
> Yes, absolutely. My point is that what the HT spec means by "host bridge"
> is not the same as what the PCI spec and Linux mean by "PCI host bridge".
Actually, they're *exactly* the same thing.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists