[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C169B81.8010707@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:13:37 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] vmscan: Write out dirty pages in batch
On 06/14/2010 07:17 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Page reclaim cleans individual pages using a_ops->writepage() because from
> the VM perspective, it is known that pages in a particular zone must be freed
> soon, it considers the target page to be the oldest and it does not want
> to wait while background flushers cleans other pages. From a filesystem
> perspective this is extremely inefficient as it generates a very seeky
> IO pattern leading to the perverse situation where it can take longer to
> clean all dirty pages than it would have otherwise.
Reclaiming clean pages should be fast enough that this should
make little, if any, difference.
> This patch queues all dirty pages at once to maximise the chances that
> the write requests get merged efficiently. It also makes the next patch
> that avoids writeout from direct reclaim more straight-forward.
However, this is a convincing argument :)
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman<mel@....ul.ie>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists