[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C179981.6040404@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:17:21 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: fixup X86_MRST selects
On 06/10/10 12:04, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 03:42:08 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 06/09/10 15:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 03:29:21 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> +++ linux-next-20100609/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -70,9 +70,10 @@ config KEYBOARD_ATARI
>>>>
>>>> config KEYBOARD_ATKBD
>>>> tristate "AT keyboard" if EMBEDDED || !X86
>>>> + depends on !X86 || (X86 && !X86_MRST)
>>>
>>> Should it be simply 'depends on !X86_MRST' and then we could kill
>>> '!X86_MRST' conditionals in selects?
>>
>> Duh, that sounds good, yes.
>
> Actually, I do not think this is a correct approach. While Moorestown does
> not have i8042 theoretically it is possible to add AT-style keyboard by
> other means (however unlikely it is) so we should not be disabling it.
>
> We should, however, disallow i8042 from being selected. Could you please
> tell me if the patch below works for you?
Yes, that's good. Thanks.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists