linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100615151849.GA19895@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:18:49 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a
	chance to veto it

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:

> Matthew, isn't it so that the POLICY_DEFAULT will pass the above test
> and possibly switch the ASPM on?

Yes. We assume that the BIOS authors aren't actively malicious.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/