lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:44:18 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Drop __must_check from bus_for_each_drv()

There is little rationale for marking bus_for_each_drv() __must_check.
It is more of an iteration helper than a real function. You don't know
in advance which callback it will be used on, so you have no clue how
important it can be to check the returned value. In practice, this
helper function can be used for best-effort tasks.

As a matter of fact, bus_for_each_dev() is not marked __must_check.
So remove it from bus_for_each_drv() as well. This is the same that
was done back in October 2006 by Russell King for
device_for_each_child(), for exactly the same reasons.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
Background: I am calling bus_for_each_drv() in i2c-core, putting the
result in a dummy variable because I know it will always be 0. Now,
gcc 4.6 complains about variables that are set but never used, so I
was proposed ugly workarounds to silent this warning. I think it is
much saner to just acknowledge that this specific __must_check was
not desirable, and clean up the code.

 include/linux/device.h |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.35-rc3.orig/include/linux/device.h	2010-05-31 09:59:56.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.35-rc3/include/linux/device.h	2010-06-16 09:37:55.000000000 +0200
@@ -84,9 +84,8 @@ struct device *bus_find_device_by_name(s
 				       struct device *start,
 				       const char *name);
 
-int __must_check bus_for_each_drv(struct bus_type *bus,
-				  struct device_driver *start, void *data,
-				  int (*fn)(struct device_driver *, void *));
+int bus_for_each_drv(struct bus_type *bus, struct device_driver *start,
+		     void *data, int (*fn)(struct device_driver *, void *));
 
 void bus_sort_breadthfirst(struct bus_type *bus,
 			   int (*compare)(const struct device *a,


-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ