[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C189CBF.1040701@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:43:27 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Really lazy fpu
On 06/16/2010 12:01 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ingo Molnar, le Wed 16 Jun 2010 10:39:41 +0200, a écrit :
>
>> in the long run most processes will be using the FPU due to SIMM
>> instructions.
>>
> I believe glibc already uses SIMM instructions for e.g. memcpy and
> friends, i.e. basically all applications...
>
I think they ought to be using 'rep movs' on newer processors, but yes
you're right.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists