[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C18B0A6.4000208@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:08:22 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_atomic() and gfn_to_pfn_atomic()
On 06/16/2010 01:51 PM, huang ying wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> btw, is_hwpoison_address() is racy. While it looks up the address, some
>> other task can unmap the page tables under us.
>>
>> Andi/Huang?
>>
>> One way of fixing it is get_user_pages_ptes_fast(), which also returns the
>> pte, also atomically. I want it for other reasons as well (respond to a
>> read fault by gupping the page for read, but allowing write access if the
>> pte indicates it is writeable).
>>
> Yes. is_hwpoison_address() is racy. But I think it is not absolutely
> necessary to call is_hwpoison_address() in hva_to_pfn_atomic(), is it?
>
We can probably ignore it, yes.
> For is_hwpoison_address() in hva_to_pfn(), we can protect it with mmap_sem.
>
Not very appealing, but should work.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists