[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100616110914.GF9298@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:09:15 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix set but unused variable warnings
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:52:58PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Given that patches 3, 4 and 5 seem to be a cases of missing error
> handling, (3 and 4 in particular seem to be breaking things rather
> than fixing them) in my humble opinion, I think this set needs some
> work and discussion.
>
> Justin, maybe you'd be better off posting the actual error messages
> (split up by subsystem) and letting the lists discuss them, rather
> than posting patches which are obviously wrong. (like the ones I've
> pointed out)
My first impression of patch 5 was "that can't be right", but upon review,
I concluded that was the best solution. If we return the PTR_ERR, this
is going to confuse every user of scsi_host_alloc who are currently only
checking for NULL.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists