[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100616165244.GB6751@lenovo>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:52:44 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 06:00:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since the current perf_disable() usage is only an optimization, remove
> it for now. This eases the removal of the weak hw_perf_enable
> interface.
>
> [ Some comments talk about NMI races, but I cannot find any such
> things. ]
>
The race was there and was fixed by commit
| commit 34adc8062227f41b04ade0ff3fbd1dbe3002669e
| Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
| Date: Wed May 20 20:13:28 2009 +0200
then you fixed it further in commit
| commit 3fb2b8ddcc6a7aa62af6bd2cb939edfd4c460506
| Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
| Date: Mon Mar 8 13:51:01 2010 +0100
which I understand as we don't need perf_disable here for sure.
Just for the record :)
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists