[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1932FB.3000404@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:24:27 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue
On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> I don't have any problem with that. I would be almost happy to get
>> your NACK.
>
> Oh yeah? why is that?
Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
discussion. So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
Thanks and have a good night.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists