linux-kernel - Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:40:12 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >> I don't have any problem with that.  I would be almost happy to get
> >> your NACK.
> > 
> > Oh yeah? why is that?
> 
> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
> discussion.  So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
> 
> Thanks and have a good night.

Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if
people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/