[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1944EF.6000507@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:41:03 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue
On 06/16/2010 10:40 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
>> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
>> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
>> discussion. So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
>> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
>
> Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if
> people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread.
No, Daniel. You don't get to tell me what I write or not. If you
don't agree with the summary, feel free to offer a better one and I
would consider to update mine. I'll provide my summary, arguments and
the link to this discussion when I send a pull request and you'll be
cc'd. You're free to present your arguments there again if you feel
necessary.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists