| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:41:03 +0200 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org> CC: mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue On 06/16/2010 10:40 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: >> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown >> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet >> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further >> discussion. So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that >> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland. > > Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if > people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread. No, Daniel. You don't get to tell me what I write or not. If you don't agree with the summary, feel free to offer a better one and I would consider to update mine. I'll provide my summary, arguments and the link to this discussion when I send a pull request and you'll be cc'd. You're free to present your arguments there again if you feel necessary. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists