[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <010f01cb0d12$a18484a0$e48d8de0$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:13:13 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: 'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com,
'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] drivers: regulator: add Maxim 8998 driver
Hello,
On Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:15 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> > Are global exports preferred over the callbacks? I saw both in different
> > MFD drivers and was not sure which one to use.
>
> > I've selected callbacks, because they are a bit nicer and don't pollute
> > the name space for each single driver. In my opinion the cost of these
> > 3 max8998_reg_{read,write,update} inline functions in regulator/max8998.c
> > is not so significant.
>
> The dereferences looked fairly painful reading the code. You can always
> do the global stuff as static inlines in the header file which avoids
> namespace pollution while keeping the code looking like a function call.
Ok, I will provide a patch that moves {read,write,update}_reg functions to
linux/mfs/max8998-private.h soon.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists