linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C1F47EF.2060509@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:07:27 +0800
From:	Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages

On 06/21/2010 07:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:56 +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>
>> I guess there might be something wrong between the augmented rbtree insert/remove ..
>
> The easiest thing is to revert that change and try again, the next step
> would be to print the full RB tree on each modification and look where
> it goes wrong.
>
> That said, I did print my fair share of (augmented) RB trees while
> playing with scheduler patches and I can't remember it ever having
> messed up like that.
He's using 2.6.35-rc2+, without your "rbtree: Undo augmented trees 
performance damage" patch ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/