[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100621153303.GA2754@joi.lan>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:33:03 +0200
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H.PeterA" <nvinhpa@...or.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:07:27PM +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 07:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:56 +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> >
> >> I guess there might be something wrong between the augmented rbtree insert/remove ..
> >
> > The easiest thing is to revert that change and try again, the next step
> > would be to print the full RB tree on each modification and look where
> > it goes wrong.
> >
> > That said, I did print my fair share of (augmented) RB trees while
> > playing with scheduler patches and I can't remember it ever having
> > messed up like that.
> He's using 2.6.35-rc2+, without your "rbtree: Undo augmented trees
> performance damage" patch ;-)
I applied it manually (commit 2463eb8b3093995e09a0d41b3d78ee0cf5fb4249 from -tip)
to 2.6.35-rc3 and it fixed both acpi's and nouveau's "invalid memtype" messages.
Thanks.
Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists