[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617134601.FBA7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:45:45 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed()
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> >
> > Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
> > it should use while_each_thread().
> >
> > It slightly improve the code readability.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> I disagree that the renaming of the variables is necessary, please simply
> change the while (tsk != start) to use while_each_thread(tsk, start);
This is common naming rule of while_each_thread(). please grep.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists