[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100621204605.B545.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:46:53 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] oom: unify CAP_SYS_RAWIO check into other superuser check
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> >
> > Now, CAP_SYS_RAWIO check is very strange. if the user have both
> > CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_RAWIO, points will makes 1/16.
> >
> > Superuser's 1/4 bonus worthness is quite a bit dubious, but
> > considerable. However 1/16 is obviously insane.
> >
>
> This is already obsoleted by the heuristic rewrite that is already under
> review.
Huh? I don't think this patch conflict against your. but I'm ok to pending
awhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists