[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006211158200.1687-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: markgross@...gnar.org
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, mark gross <640e9920@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, mark gross wrote:
> Your confused about what problem this patch attempts to solve.
I don't think so. Rafael's description was pretty clear.
> There is
> a pm_qos patch in the works to address the suspend blocker
> functionality.
> http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-June/026760.html
No. That patch addresses something _similar_ to the suspend blocker
functionality. The fact remains, though, that pm_qos is not used
during system suspend (the /sys/power/state interface), hence changes
to pm_qos won't solve the system-suspend problems that suspend blockers
do solve.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists