lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1FA141.30006@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:28:33 -0700
From:	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>,
	dwalker@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] msm: Add gpio register address mapping information.

Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Yeah. Either this can be replaced with GPL, and it such case just do
>>> so, or it can not, and then it can not be applied to kernel.
>>>
>> This is a standard BSD-style license so it's compatible w/ the GPL.  Thanks.
> 
> The kernel requires GPL, and its much much easier for everyone to state
> so explicitly to avoid future surprises (remember 4 clause BSD was once
> thought GPL compatible even by the FSF...)
> 
> If you want to make it clear it's also available BSD licensed in this
> form (at least until someone changes it) see the wording in files like
> drivers/char/random.c
> 
> That usually keeps all the lawyers happy.
> 
> Alan

Keeping the lawyers happy certainly has it's challenges.  Is it uncommon 
to use just a BSD-style license for headers?  I understand that everyone 
would prefer just GPL.  I'm primarily curious about preserving BSD 
licensing for headers under /include.  A dual license would work, but 
would it also be frowned upon to use just a 3-clause BSD license like we 
have in this patch?  Thanks.

- Bryan

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ