lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277142679.17092.37.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:51:19 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] msm: Add gpio register address mapping information.

On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:18 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Yeah. Either this can be replaced with GPL, and it such case just do
> > > so, or it can not, and then it can not be applied to kernel.
> > > 
> > 
> > This is a standard BSD-style license so it's compatible w/ the GPL.  Thanks.
> 
> The kernel requires GPL, and its much much easier for everyone to state
> so explicitly to avoid future surprises (remember 4 clause BSD was once
> thought GPL compatible even by the FSF...)
> 
> If you want to make it clear it's also available BSD licensed in this
> form (at least until someone changes it) see the wording in files like
> drivers/char/random.c
> 
> That usually keeps all the lawyers happy.

I guess this is a fairly confusing issues .. I found a number of regular
BSD licenses in the kernel , many under include/linux/ ,

include/linux/nfs4_acl.h

in fact most of nfsd is BSD only, at least directly in the .c files.
There could be some statement someplace else that I missed.

include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h
include/linux/quota.h

Just structures ..

Is it possible that no code header files can be BSD only? From looking
at the directory that is kind of what it looks like.

Daniel

-- 
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ