[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100622081803.4d472542@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:18:03 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: markgross@...gnar.org
Cc: 640e9920@...il.com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:58:37 -0700
mark gross <640e9920@...il.com> wrote:
> wrong. They are about 1) adding opportunistic suspend, and 2) adding
> critical sections to block suspend.
>
> No race issues where ever talked about until alternative solutions
> where put up.
The whole and only reason to even define the term "critical sections" is
when you need to define "a race". Or vice versa. A race is prevented by
defining critical sections and protecting these against concurrent
access.
[..snip..]
[some rant that alan is not familiar with android userspace..]
Are you suggesting that only android developers are supposed to talk
about this?
This is a pretty basic thing. It has only to do with system suspend.
(And using system suspend aggressively)
>
> --mgross
>
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists