lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:18:03 +0200 From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: 640e9920@...il.com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:58:37 -0700 mark gross <640e9920@...il.com> wrote: > wrong. They are about 1) adding opportunistic suspend, and 2) adding > critical sections to block suspend. > > No race issues where ever talked about until alternative solutions > where put up. The whole and only reason to even define the term "critical sections" is when you need to define "a race". Or vice versa. A race is prevented by defining critical sections and protecting these against concurrent access. [..snip..] [some rant that alan is not familiar with android userspace..] Are you suggesting that only android developers are supposed to talk about this? This is a pretty basic thing. It has only to do with system suspend. (And using system suspend aggressively) > > --mgross > Cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists