linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/40] x86, compat: convert ia32 layer to use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100623101402.GA10564@lst.de>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:14:02 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/40] x86, compat: convert ia32 layer to use

Any reason we need to differenciate between COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE and
ARCH_COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE?  We don't need this for native system calls,
so I can't see the reason to do it for compat system calls.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/