[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100623103619.GC5242@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:36:21 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, x86@...nel.org,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/40] x86, compat: convert ia32 layer to use
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Any reason we need to differenciate between COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE and
> ARCH_COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE? We don't need this for native system calls,
> so I can't see the reason to do it for compat system calls.
>
I think we wanted that to keep the sys32_ prefixed based naming, to avoid
collisions with generic compat handler names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists