[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C232AAC.2010200@orcon.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:51:40 +1200
From: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
mattst88@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
alexdeucher@...il.com, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Problems with alpha/pci + radeon/ttm
On 22/06/10 20:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:59 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:19:43 -0400
>> Matt Turner<mattst88@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Cree and I have been debugging FDO bug 26403 [1]. I tried
>>> booting with `radeon.test=1` and found this, which I think is related:
Note that my radeon card is PCI whereas I think Matt may be using an AGP
card.
My logs are very similar to Matt's except I don't see the following line:
>>>> pci_map_single failed: could not allocate dma page tables
>> This happens in the latest git, right?
Indeed, testing 2.6.35-rc3 (plus a couple or so extra patches to fix
unrelated compile errors).
>> Is this a regression (what kernel version worked)?
>>
>> Seems that the IOMMU can't find 128 pages. It's likely due to:
>>
>> - out of the IOMMU space (possibly someone doesn't free the IOMMU
>> space).
>>
>> or
>>
>> - the mapping parameters (such as align) aren't appropriate so the
>> IOMMU can't find space.
>
> I don't think KMS drivers have ever worked on alpha so its not a
> regression, they are working fine on x86 + powerpc and sparc has been
> run at least once.
KMS on the console boot up has worked since about 2.6.32, but starting
up the X server has always failed and, in my case, the system becomes
unstable and eventually OOPs.
> I suspect we are simply hitting the limits of the iommu, how big an
> address space does it handle? since generally graphics drivers try to
> bind a lot of things to the GART.
No idea on the address space limit. I applied the patch of Fujita that
logs all IOMMU allocations, and also inserted some extra printks in the
ttm kernel code so that I could see which routines failed and the error
code returned. Running the radeon test on boot exhibits the following:
[ 238.712768] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset
0x1a312000
[ 239.281127] [drm] Tested GTT->VRAM and VRAM->GTT copy for GTT offset
0x1a412000
[ 239.281127] ttm_tt_bind belched -12
[ 239.282104] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem belched -12
[ 239.282104] ttm_bo_move_buffer belched -12
[ 239.282104] ttm_bo_validate belched -12
[ 239.282104] radeon 0000:01:00.0: object_init failed for (1048576,
0x00000002) err=-12
[ 239.282104] [drm:radeon_test_moves] *ERROR* Failed to create GTT
object 419
[ 239.399291] Error while testing BO move.
Note that no IOMMU allocations are printed while radeon_test_moves is
running so iommu_arena_alloc doesn't appear to be called. Also the
error code returned up to radeon_test_moves is -12 which is ENOMEM. So
does appear to be some memory limit.
> It might be worth limiting the PCIGART in radeon to 32MB to see if the
> lower limit helps.
So, how does one do that?
Cheers
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists