[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lja4ahad.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:52:58 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: npiggin@...e.de
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 37/52] fs: icache lazy lru
npiggin@...e.de writes:
> Impelemnt lazy inode lru similarly to dcache. This will reduce lock
> acquisition and will help to improve lock ordering subsequently.
Or just drop inode LRU completely and only rely on the dcache for that?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists