[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006250857040.18900@router.home>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:07:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages,
not page order
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Fix simple argument error. Usually 'order' is very small value than
> lru_pages. then it can makes unnecessary icache dropping.
This is going to reduce the delta that is added to shrinker->nr
significantly thereby increasing the number of times that shrink_slab() is
called.
What does the "lru_pages" parameter do in shrink_slab()? Looks
like its only role is as a divison factor in a complex calculation of
pages to be scanned.
do_try_to_free_pages passes 0 as "lru_pages" to shrink_slab() when trying
to do cgroup lru scans. Why is that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists