[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006250912380.18900@router.home>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:17:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmscan: don't subtraction of unsined
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 'slab_reclaimable' and 'nr_pages' are unsigned. so, subtraction is
> unsafe.
Why? We are subtracting the current value of NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE from the
earlier one. The result can be negative (maybe concurrent allocations) and
then the nr_reclaimed gets decremented instead. This is okay since we
have not reached our goal then of reducing the number of reclaimable slab
pages on the zone.
> @@ -2622,17 +2624,21 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> * Note that shrink_slab will free memory on all zones and may
> * take a long time.
> */
> - while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, lru_pages) &&
> - zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) >
> - slab_reclaimable - nr_pages)
The comparison could be a problem here. So
zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) + nr_pages >
slab_reclaimable
?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists