[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100627141638.GD3970@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:16:40 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, dm-devel@...hat.com,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request
payload
On Sun, Jun 27 2010 at 8:32am -0400,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:07:12 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> > > How about this?
> >
> > As I tried to explain before this utterly confuses the I/O completion
> > path. With the patch applied even a simple mkfs.xfs that issues discard
> > just hangs.
>
> Wired. I just tried mkfs.xfs against scsi_debug with my block patches
> (I saw one discard command). Seemed that it worked fine.
My leak fixes have been tested extensively against all permuations of
devices with discards (ATA trim, SCSI UNMAP, SCSI WRTIE SAME w/ unmap=1).
I think we need to get Christoph's discard payload transformation
complete by fixing the leaks _without_ trying to rework how discard
commands are tagged, etc. E.g. fix what Jens already has staged in
linux-2.6-block's 'for-next' and 'for-2.6.36'.
With that sorted out we can then look at longer term changes to cleanup
discard request processing.
Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists