[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100628111409.GA20103@shinshilla>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:14:09 +0400
From: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
To: dkirjanov@...nel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>,
charrer@...critech.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: slicoss: Change return codes to -EYYY.
> > @@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ static void slic_link_event_handler(struct adapter *adapter)
> > #else
> > Stop compilation;
> > #endif
> > - ASSERT((status == STATUS_SUCCESS) || (status == STATUS_PENDING));
> > + ASSERT(status == 0);
> > }
> >
>
> Now that looks useless since slic_upr_request can return STATUS_PENDING
> or -ENOMEM. Same for slic_config_get
Yes, it seems that slic_link_event_handler & slic_config_get have to return error codes.
> > @@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static u32 slic_card_locate(struct adapter *adapter)
> >
> > ASSERT(card);
> > if (!card)
> > - return STATUS_FAILURE;
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Is -ENOMEM correct for this case?
>
Right, maybe ENXIO?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists