[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C28ADC9.1050706@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:12:25 +0400
From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>
To: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>,
charrer@...critech.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: slicoss: Change return codes to -EYYY.
On 06/28/2010 03:14 PM, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
>>> @@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ static void slic_link_event_handler(struct adapter *adapter)
>>> #else
>>> Stop compilation;
>>> #endif
>>> - ASSERT((status == STATUS_SUCCESS) || (status == STATUS_PENDING));
>>> + ASSERT(status == 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Now that looks useless since slic_upr_request can return STATUS_PENDING
>> or -ENOMEM. Same for slic_config_get
> Yes, it seems that slic_link_event_handler& slic_config_get have to return error codes.
>
>>> @@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static u32 slic_card_locate(struct adapter *adapter)
>>>
>>> ASSERT(card);
>>> if (!card)
>>> - return STATUS_FAILURE;
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> Is -ENOMEM correct for this case?
>>
> Right, maybe ENXIO?
>
Yes, I'm fine with this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists