[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006282319.27758.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:19:27 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <640e9920@...il.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [update] Re: [PATCH] PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost
On Monday, June 28, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Below is the patch I'd like to add to suspend-2.6/linux-next.
> >
> > Rafael
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Subject: PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost
> >
> > One of the arguments during the suspend blockers discussion was that
> > the mainline kernel didn't contain any mechanisms making it possible
> > to avoid losing wakeup events during system suspend.
>
> I don't see anything more to complain about in the patch. :-)
Great! :-)
> You probably should change the title and the first paragraph of the
> description to avoid saying that events can get lost. Like:
>
> PM: Make it possible to avoid races between wakeup and system sleep
I will, thanks!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists