[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53596.65110.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: mark gross <640e9920@...il.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost
Did someone post the canonical driver changes
to make use of this? Something like
suspend() { /* if wake-enabled, up count */ }
resume() { /* if upcounted, downcount */ }
is what first comes to mind.. expecting that
the suspend/resume methods in the driver are
already doing the right things for enabling
and later disabling the "system wake" behavior
on the various relevant hardware events...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists