[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2A2A01.9010307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:14:41 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5]acpi:glue.c Fix warning: variable 'ret' set but not
used
On 06/29/2010 08:47 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> + if (fn) {
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "dev%d: Failed to create
>> firmware_node: %d\n", status, fn);
>> + }else if (pn) {
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "dev%d: Failed to create
>> physical_node: %d\n", status, pn);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> The if-statement should be correctly indented (it's inside another
> if-body, so needs to be one more tab over) and there needs to be a space
> before the else.
>
o.k., so it should look something like this:
if (fn) {
code...
} else if (pn) {
> You should probably split your printks up so they don't exceed 80 chars too,
> for example:
>
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "dev%d: Failed to create physical_node: %d\n",
> status, pn);
>
> Also 'status' is probably the wrong thing to print as the number in "dev%d".
> If it worked, that should be unconditionally AE_OK, I think. Can you not use
> dev_warn() or similar instead or printk?
>
> David
>
alright, I'll look at this today. I'm not the best at making printks in
fact I'm more intimidated by them..(so with this in mind, I'm going to
sit and make myself learn this, so I atleast have a better idea of doing
these than I have now.)
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists