[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100630164452.AA3D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:26:20 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] oom: oom_kill_process() doesn't select kthread child
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> >
> > Now, select_bad_process() have PF_KTHREAD check, but oom_kill_process
> > doesn't. It mean oom_kill_process() may choose wrong task, especially,
> > when the child are using use_mm().
> >
>
> This type of check should be moved to badness(), it will prevent these
> types of tasks from being selected both in select_bad_process() and
> oom_kill_process() if the score it returns is 0.
No, process check order of select_bad_process() is certain meaningful.
Only PF_KTHREAD check can move into badness(). Okey, that's fix to
incorrect /proc/<pid>/oom_score issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists