[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100624211415.802E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:26:19 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] oom: oom_kill_process() need to check p is unkillable
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > > > When oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled, an argument task of
> > > > oom_kill_process is not selected by select_bad_process(), It's
> > > > just out_of_memory() caller task. It mean the task can be
> > > > unkillable. check it first.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This should be unnecessary if oom_kill_process() appropriately returns
> > > non-zero when it cannot kill a task. What problem are you addressing with
> > > this fix?
> >
> > oom_kill_process() only check its children are unkillable, not its own.
>
> No, oom_kill_process() returns the value of oom_kill_task(victim) which is
> non-zero for !victim->mm in mmotm-2010-06-11-16-40 (and 2.6.34 although
> victim == p in that case).
oom_kill_task() only check OOM_DISABLE. and Minchan elaborated more detailed
concern. please see his mail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists