linux-kernel - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Jeremy@...inet12.oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen

Hi Stefano --

What versions of Xen are compatible with this series?
I.e. is 4.0 required?  Are all Xen-side changes in
official 4.0.0?  Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore
will be in 4.0.1)?  Or only in xen-unstable?

If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point
out the changesets?

Thanks,
Dan

P.S. Sorry if I missed earlier discussion or documentation
on this... but if not otherwise documented, maybe the
info should be in the patch comment?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:39 AM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Fitzhardinge; xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com;
> Jeremy@...inet12.oracle.com; Stefano Stabellini; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Don Dutile; Sheng Yang
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of
> changes
> > > compared to the previous version follows:
> >
> > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of
> > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I
> am
> > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not.
> >
> > And in this first intro email state:
> >
> > Since v7 the following things have changed:
> >  - Konrad made some comments.
> >  - etc.
> >
> 
> Good point, I'll do that from now on.
> I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/