[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2C4319.6090906@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:26:17 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
CC: Chris Li <lkml@...isli.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314
On 7/1/2010 12:12 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:51 +0100, Williams, Dan J wrote:
>> This version of the device only exists on the 5400 chipset and always
>> has its own iommu, but since other platforms get the DMAR entry right I
>> think this hammer is too big? Wouldn't this break VT-d operation on
>> non-busted platforms?
>
> That just means we have to get the quirk right. Does 'this version' of
> the device have its own PCI ID? We can always fall back to checking the
> ID of the device at 0000:00:00.0 to check which chipset we're on.
>
PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IOAT_SNB only exists on this chipset and to date
only "MacPro3,1" platforms have this problem.
>> Alternatively I can just catch this failure earlier in the init process
>> and fail the driver load with a grumble printk about broken bios...
>> instead of the current BUG_ON() that is meant to catch runtime catastrophes.
>
> Please use WARN_TAINT(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND). That way the
> statistics end up in kerneloops.org and we have found that extremely
> useful when LARTing the offending vendors.
>
Good to know, thanks.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists