[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2E52DD.2050306@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:58:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, dtor@...l.ru,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] input: i8042 - add runtime check in x86's i8042_platform_init
[Cc: Tony Luck]
On 07/02/2010 01:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, feng.tang@...el.com wrote:
>
>> From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
>>
>> Then it will first check x86_platforms's i8042 detection result,
>> then go on with normal probe.
>>
>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
>> index 6168469..2e14fc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
>> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
>> @@ -840,6 +840,10 @@ static int __init i8042_platform_init(void)
>> {
>> int retval;
>>
>> + /* Just return if pre-detection shows no i8042 controller exist */
>> + if (!x86_platform.i8042_detect())
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> That's going to break IA64 :(
>
I have to say there is an awful lot of code in that file which is
specific to x86 (more so than IA64)... anyone has a feel if it would
make sense to break it up?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists