[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100705132245.GA6876@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:22:45 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Possible bug in net/ipv4/route.c?
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:59:14PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Why do we clear full 48 bytes skb->cb[] in skb_alloc(), if no protocol
> stack should rely it being zero ?
Unless a protocol is allocating the skb itself, then the fact
that skb_alloc clears skb->cb is no guarantee that the skb->cb
will be zero.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists