linux-kernel - Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:51:19 -0700
From:	Chris Li <lkml@...isli.org>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> No, it should be PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IOAT_SNB (0x402f) for the dma
> engine at 00:0f.0 .  PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ESB2_0 is the LPC controller at
> 00:1f.0,
>
>> That seems to be the reason preventing the warning to be print out. I am not
>> sure the warning should be always print out. Just curious why it did
>> not trigger.
>
> It should always trigger, and I have verified as much with the attached
> replacement patch (by forcing the error on a working system), but we run
> into a new problem.  dma_pool_alloc() assumes that any dma_mapping error
> is transient.  Do we need a new type of dma_mapping_error() that
> indicates permanent failure versus ENOMEM?  The driver can handle the
> allocation failure, but it never gets the chance.

Should I test your V2 patch instead?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/