[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:58:11 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Chris Li <lkml@...isli.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314
On 7/6/2010 5:51 PM, Chris Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>> No, it should be PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IOAT_SNB (0x402f) for the dma
>> engine at 00:0f.0 . PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ESB2_0 is the LPC controller at
>> 00:1f.0,
>>
>>> That seems to be the reason preventing the warning to be print out. I am not
>>> sure the warning should be always print out. Just curious why it did
>>> not trigger.
>>
>> It should always trigger, and I have verified as much with the attached
>> replacement patch (by forcing the error on a working system), but we run
>> into a new problem. dma_pool_alloc() assumes that any dma_mapping error
>> is transient. Do we need a new type of dma_mapping_error() that
>> indicates permanent failure versus ENOMEM? The driver can handle the
>> allocation failure, but it never gets the chance.
>
> Should I test your V2 patch instead?
>
It would confirm that we are catching the BIOS misconfiguration, but
your system will get stuck in this loop. So just make sure you can get
back to a working config, which it sounds like you can.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists