[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100707113208.02e49474.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:32:08 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc4 - CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored?
Hi Michal,
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:29:34 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 05, 2010, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 11:25:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hmm. Am I dong anything particularly wrong, or is CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored
> > > now, as it seems?
> >
> > (also reported by Stephen earlier that day)
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:39:41AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build produced this
> > > warning (but it should be a failure ...):
> > >
> > > /bin/sh: scripts/setlocalversion: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Probably introduced by commit 0a564b2645c8766a669c55bde1f1ef5b0518caec
> > > ("kbuild: Propagate LOCALVERSION= down to scripts/setlocalversion").
> > >
> > > That commit really isn't ready for inclusion in Linus' tree ...
> >
> >
> > Oops, I'm an idiot. The below patch should fix localversion again:
>
> Yes, it helps here.
I also applied it to linux-next yesterday (in my fixes tree) and it
solves the problem.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists